MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248890718 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db200644

Belarus economic woes may complicate presidential poll

2015· other· en· W4248890718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussia and Soviet political economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemOpposition (politics)RecessionEconomicsEconomic policyLoanPolitical scienceDebtQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomyEconomic historyFinanceMacroeconomicsPoliticsGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance This year started with a contraction of first-quarter GDP, after two years of very slow growth. Industrial output contracted as well. As world oil prices have dropped, Belarus no longer receives windfall proceeds from exporting distillates produced from cheap Russian crude. The onset of a systemic recession in an election year may prove particularly troublesome for President Alexander Lukashenka. Perhaps in anticipation of the worsening economic conditions, the electoral commission asked legislators to schedule this year's presidential polls on October 11, a month earlier than expected. Impacts To prevent economic failures from swaying voters away from Lukashenka, the authorities will step up suppression of opposition. Minsk may look for increased investment and strengthening of relations in the Asia-Pacific region as a way to boost the economy. According to Russian Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak, Russia is considering a loan to Belarus to help refinance its debts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicRussia and Soviet political economyFrench-language works237,207