MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248947246 · doi:10.1097/imi.0b013e3182746a6e

Minimal-Access Left Ventricular Assist Device Explantation

2012· article· en· W4248947246 on OpenAlexaff
Anson Cheung, Jia-Lin Soon

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricular assist deviceIntensive care unitSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyHeart failureCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support can be successfully bridged to recovery. A novel explantation technique is reviewed. Six HeartMate II patients were successfully explanted off-pump through a combination of a left anterior minithoracotomy and a subxiphoid incision. A retrospective review of the institutional LVAD database was performed. The median LVAD support duration was 191 days (range, 69-307 days). There was no procedural or 30-day mortality associated with the LVAD explantation, and all patients are in New York Heart Association I to II at a median follow-up of 688 days (range, 127-1033 days). This procedure was associated with minimal blood transfusion and short intensive care unit stay (median, 1 day; range, 1-5 days) and hospitalization (median, 4.5 days; range, 3-19 days). One postexplant embolic cerebral infarct occurred. The HeartMate II LVAD can be safely explanted through a less conventional minimal-access approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular SurgerySame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207