MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248959900 · doi:10.1109/wsc.1993.718400

Montoring Manufacturing System Behavior by Continuous Discrete-Event Simulation

2005· article· en· W4248959900 on OpenAlex
M. Fabre, D. Leblanc

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 1993 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC '93) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designComputer scienceDiscrete event simulationScheduling (production processes)Distributed computingIndustrial engineeringObject-oriented programmingSimulationReal-time computingSystems engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simulation environment (COGNOSCO) designed to monitor the evolution of manufacturing systems is presented. Assuming that today manufacturing simulation is dedicated to (long term) system design or to (short term) scheduling, this environment is an attempt to address the continuum of decisions that lie between these two, extremes. Its object-oriented basis ports modular and graphical modeling. A model can be connected either the simulation engine to evaluate decisions, or to the production system to monitor its behavior. Simple instruments are used to track the evolution of important variables, while knowledge bases will provide the user with focused information and valid candidate decisions when a shock or progressive alteration in performances arise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it