MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249030258 · doi:10.1086/688279

Notes on Contributors

2016· article· en· W4249030258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOsiris · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Emotions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous articleNext article FreeNotes on ContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreDamien Boquet is Senior Lecturer in History of the Middle Ages at the University of Aix-Marseille, and author of L’ordre de l’affect au Moyen Âge: Autour de l’anthropologie affective d’Aelred de Rievaulx [The order of affect in the Middle Ages: Around the affective anthropology of Aelred of Rievaulx] (Caen, 2005).Felicity Callard is Reader in Social Science for Medical Humanities at the Department of Geography and Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University. She has wide-ranging research interests in the historical geography of twentieth- and twenty-first-century psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis, and cognitive neuroscience. She is Editor-in-Chief of History of the Human Sciences, and Group Leader of “Hubbub at Wellcome Collection”—an interdisciplinary research program on rest and its opposites that brings together humanists, social scientists, life scientists, and artists.Naama Cohen-Hanegbi is a lecturer in the History Department of Tel Aviv University. She has published articles on the medical and religious treatment of emotions and on medicine within interreligious encounters. Currently she is preparing a manuscript entitled “Practices of Care: Medical and Pastoral Writings on the Accidents of the Soul, 1200–1500.”Otniel E. Dror is the Joel Wilbush Chair in Medical Anthropology and Head of the Section for the History of Medicine in the Medical Faculty at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He recently published Knowledge and Pain (coedited with Esther Cohen, Leona Toker, and Manuela Consonni; New York, 2012), and his Blush, Flush, Adrenaline: Science, Modernity and Paradigms of Emotions, 1850–1930 is under revision for the University of Chicago Press. He is currently working on the history of the study of pleasure and reward during the post–World War II period.Eric J. Engstrom is a Research Associate in the Department of History at Humboldt University in Berlin and a member of the working group on the history of psychiatry at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich. He has published widely on the history of psychiatry, including a monograph, Clinical Psychiatry in Imperial Germany (Ithaca, N.Y., 2004). He is also coeditor of the multivolume edition of the papers and correspondence of the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin. He is currently researching and writing a book on the history of forensic cultures in Wilhelmine Berlin.Anne Harrington is the Franklin L. Ford Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University, specializing in the history of psychiatry, neuroscience, and the other mind and behavioral sciences. Her publications include Medicine, Mind and the Double Brain (Princeton, N.J., 1988), Reenchanted Science (Princeton, N.J., 1997), and The Cure Within (New York, 2007), and a forthcoming book, The Biological Turn in Psychiatry.Bettina Hitzer is Minerva Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin. Her research interests range from the history of migration and the history of religion to the history of medicine and the history of emotions. She is a coauthor of Learning How to Feel: Children’s Literature and Emotional Socialization, 1870–1970 (Oxford, 2014); coeditor, with Pascal Eitler and Monique Scheer, of “Feeling and Faith—Religious Emotions in German History,” special issue, German History, volume 32, number 3 (2014); and author of “Oncomotions: Experiences and Debates in West Germany and the United States after 1945,” in Science and Emotions after 1945: A Transatlantic Perspective, edited by F. Biess and D. M. Gross (Chicago, 2014).Anja Laukötter is a researcher in the Department of the History of Emotions at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, where she is working on a book concerning the history of knowledge and emotions in health education films in the twentieth century. After earning her PhD in the history of anthropology and anthropological museums at Humboldt University in Berlin, she researched the history of human experiments at the Institute for the History of Medicine, Berlin. She is the author of various publications in the field of the history of science and knowledge, postcolonial studies, visual media (including the history of educational films), and history of emotions throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. She is codirecting with Christian Bonah the ERC Advanced Grant BodyCapital, The Healthy Self as Body Capital: Individuals, Market-Based Societies and Body Politics in Visual Twentieth Century Europe.Pilar León-Sanz is Associate Professor of the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics at the University of Navarra and a member of the project “Emotional Culture and Identity” at the Institute of Culture and Society (UN). Her research interests include medicine in eighteenth-century Spain, especially music therapy, and the practices of health care professionals during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries; she is also studying the evolution of the concept of emotion and its place in medical knowledge. Her publications include La Tarantola Spagnola: Empirismo e tradizione nel XVIII secolo (Lecce, 2008); “From Claims to Rights: Patient Complaints and the Evolution of a Mutual Aid Society (La Conciliación, 1902–1936), in Complaints, Controversies and Grievances in Medicine: Historical and Social Science Perspectives, edited by Jonathan Reinarz and Rebecca Winter (New York, 2015); “Music Therapy in Eighteenth Century Spain: Perspectives and Critiques,” in Music and the Nerves 1700–1900, edited by James Kennaway (London, 2014); “Resentment in Psychosomatic Pathology (1939–1960),” in On Resentment: Past and Present, edited by Bernardino Fantini, Dolores Martín Moruno, and Javier Moscoso (Newcastle upon Tyne, 2013); and “Evolution of the Concept of Emotion in Medicine: A Music-Therapy Approach,” in The Emotions and Cultural Analysis, edited by Ana Marta González (New York, 2012).Rafael Mandressi is a historian and researcher at the Centre Alexandre-Koyré d’Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris. His main field of research is the history of medicine in early modern Europe. He has published Le Regard de l’anatomiste: dissections et invention du corps en Occident (Paris, 2003), and about sixty articles, mainly on the history of anatomy, on printed medical images, and on the history of cerebral functions.Dolores Martín Moruno works at the Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities (iEH2) at the University of Geneva. After earning a PhD in philosophy from the Universidad Autónoma (Madrid) and in the history of science from the Centre Alexandre-Koyré (Paris), she was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Centre de Recherche en Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques (Paris), the Bakken Museum (Minneapolis), and the Queen Mary University of London. She is the author of various publications on the history of emotions and specifically about the changing cultural perceptions of resentment, melancholy, and love between the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries.Piroska Nagy is Professor of History of the Middle Ages at Université de Québec à Montréal and author of Le Don des larmes: Un instrument spirituel en quête d’institution, V–XIIIe s. [The gift of tears: A spiritual instrument seeking institution, 5th–13th c.] (Paris, 2000). In 2006, she and Damien Boquet founded the research program EMMA (Emotions in the Middle Ages; http://emma.hypotheses.org). They have codirected several publications: Le Sujet des émotions au Moyen Âge (Paris, 2009), Politiques des émotions au Moyen Âge (Florence, 2010), and “La Chair des émotions au Moyen Âge,” special issue, Médiévales, volume 61 (2011). Her most recent book, coauthored by Boquet, is Sensible Moyen Âge: Une histoire culturelle des émotions et de la vie affective dans l’Occident médiéval [Emotional Middle Ages: A cultural history of the emotions and affective life in the medieval West] (Paris, 2015). Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Osiris Volume 31, Number 12016History of Science and the Emotions Published for the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/688279 Views: 287Total views on this site © 2016 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it