Modeling and Simulation of Canadian Forces Strategic Lift Strategies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In support of Canadian forces (CF) transformation, a study was conducted to explore strategic lift movement strategies within the context of rapid deployability to counter asymmetric threats in failed or failing states around the globe. This study makes extensive use of two interconnected models. An aircraft loading optimization model using a combination of simulated annealing and genetic algorithm techniques with a novel convex hull based measure of effectiveness was developed to derive near-optimal loading plans across a fleet of transportation assets. The output from the loading model was then fed into a Monte Carlo simulation framework developed to allow for study of the effectiveness of a variety of strategic lift options. Analysis indicates that pre-positioning of equipment at various international locations and increased use of C-17 aircraft for airlift -where economically viable - could be potential strategies for improvement of the CF strategic lift
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it