MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249056486 · doi:10.4000/communication.6138

Béatrice VACHER, Yanita ANDONOVA, Anne-France KOGAN, Anne MONJARET, Beanlisoa RAVALISON et Carsten WILHELM (2014), Vive la technologie ? Traité de bricolage réfléchi pour épris de liberté

2015· article· fr· W4249056486 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-Simon Demers, Luc Bonneville

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBricolagePhilosophyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

D’après Béatrice Vacher et ses collègues qui ont participé à la rédaction de cet ouvrage original qui s’adresse autant aux universitaires qu’au grand public, ce n’est pas tant la technologie en elle-même qui est à louer que la capacité humaine de la bricoler et de l’adapter aux usages personnels multiples qui varient dans le temps et dans l’espace. L’idée de l’ouvrage est d’offrir aux lecteurs « des clés d’interprétation pour un usage libéré et raisonné de la technologie » (p. 10), ce qui est...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207