MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Death Drives

2016· book-chapter· en· W4249069678 on OpenAlexaff
Stefano Evangelista

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecadence, Literature, and Society
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecadenceDeath drivePsychoanalytic theoryPsychoanalysisPleasureIdentity (music)Key (lock)PhilosophyLiteratureArt historyArtAestheticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article argues that Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of the death drive in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) is in dialogue with a set of aesthetic and philosophical principles that inform literary Decadence around the turn of the century. It starts from an analysis of August Weismann’s scientific studies of evolution and mortality, developed in the late nineteenth century, which were influential with Freud. It then studies the features of a perverse desire for death that are found in the works of a number of key writers associated with Decadence, including Charles Baudelaire, Michael Field, A. E. Housman, Walter Pater, A. C. Swinburne, Oscar Wilde, and W. B. Yeats. Particular attention is paid to the connection between death and sexual desire and identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicDecadence, Literature, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207