MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249108083 · doi:10.18162/fp.2020.743

Enseigner en contexte de pandémie : quelles différences entre les professeurs du primaire, du secondaire et de l’université?

2020· article· fr· W4249108083 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca Dahm, Nathalie Huet, Alexa Craïs

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et profession · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enseigner en contexte de pandmie : quelles diffrences entre les professeurs du primaire, du secondaire et de l'universit ? Formation et profession 28(4 hors-srie), 2020 sum Lors de la pandmie lie de COVID-19 du printemps 2020, les enseignants ont t contraints d'assurer la continuit pdagogique en rinventant leur enseignement en dehors de la classe. Par consquent, le recours aux outils numriques s' est avr incontournable. Cette recherche value, travers une enqute adresse 847 enseignants de langue vivante trangre ou rgionale exerant dans des tablissements franais, si le niveau d' enseignement desdits enseignants a un effet sur l'anxit qu'ils ressentent, sur leur sentiment d' efficacit personnelle, ainsi que sur leurs perceptions et usages des outils technologiques en contexte de confinement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFormation et professionSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207