Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The field of group theory and its application in the field of psychotherapy has burgeoned over the last 50 years. Currently, group methods are used under several theoretical umbrellas. The goals of group therapy are varied from overall personality reorganization to symptom‐focused work. Specific populations are sometimes treated in homogeneous groups and inpatient units are evermore dependent on group interventions. The psychological economy of working in groups matches the fiscal economy, which is such a challenge at the turn of the twenty‐first century. This chapter explores the broad spectrum. Beginning with a brief history of group psychotherapy and its evolution, we then examine the theorists whose work has been expressed in group practice. These include the psychodynamic theorists, nonanalytic theorists, and the divisions within those various umbrella groups. We offer a developmental map of a therapy group and end with a section on the research in group efficacy and applicability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it