MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249167946 · doi:10.21098/bemp.v13i3.392

QUARTERLY ANALYSIS: The Progress of Monetary, Banking and Payment System Quarter IV – 2010

2011· article· en· W4249167946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Author Team of Quarterly Report Bank Indonesia

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)IndonesianEconomicsInvestment (military)EconomyMonetary economicsPaymentBusinessInternational economicsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The economy of Indonesia in 2010 showed a quite high growth acceleration in the middle of the imbalance of global economic recovery. The domestic economy is forecasted to grow 6.1% in the fourth quarter of 2010 that in general, the national economy in 2010 grow about 6%. For 2011 and 2012, Bank Indonesia is optimistic that the recovery of domestic economy will be stronger, supported by the increased domestic demand with a better investment performance. The Indonesian economy in 2011 is forecasted to grow up to 6.0 to 6.5% and in 2012 is predicted to become 6.1 to 6.6%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Monetary Economics and BankingSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207