Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rsum : Le songe a souvent t associ au rve ou la rverie sans qu'on puisse en dterminer la nature exacte. L'usage du mot lui-mme semble appartenir au registre vieilli et connoter une poque rvolue en littrature. Pourtant, Anne Hbert n'hsite pas en faire le point nodal de son oeuvre. Le titre de son premier recueil, Les songes en quilibre, sert de vecteur ce projet d'criture qui trouve son aboutissement dans Le tombeau des rois, ainsi que dans les oeuvres subsquentes. Cet article fait d'abord brivement le point sur la thorie du songe pour en prciser les enjeux et souligner sa pertinence. On y dfinit ensuite le songe dans son fonctionnement psychique en regard de son application littraire chez Anne Hbert. En quoi l'enfance peut-elle par ailleurs en constituer l'origine ou le dclencheur ? Comment le recueil trouve-t-il son unit et son homognit l'intrieur du cadre-songe ? Quel est le but de la qute obstine qu'entreprend la songeuse ? Qui est l'auteur du songe ? Pourquoi enfin ce combat perptuel ou polmos au coeur du songe ? Mots-cls : Le tombeau des rois, Les songes en quilibre, Songe, Subjectivit, Posie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".