MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4249179082 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14651955.v1

Regime-Switching Behaviour In US Equity Indices: Two State Model With Kalman Filter Tracking And Finite State Machine Trading System

2021· preprint· en· W4249179082 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy Little

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterEconometricsEquity (law)Index (typography)EconomicsInvestment (military)State (computer science)Extended Kalman filterComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents a time varying regime-switching model for US equity index daily returns. The parameters of the model are estimated recursively with the Kalman lter. We demonstrate our model and parameter estimation technique are effective by demonstrating improvements in model t compared to alternate models. Information from our model is used to build a Finite State Machine trading system with back-tested performance in excess of 15,000% above a buy and hold strategy for the DOW Jones Industrial average from 1928-2012. Similar results are found for both the S&P 500 index and the NASDAQ Composite index over a long period. Our model succeeds at identifying pro table investment opportunities and improving model t with a minimum of parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStochastic processes and financial applications→French-language works237,207→