MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249221068 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14663031

Functional Comparison Of Immunoglobulin G Versus Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotien Phagocytic Receptors In Human U937 Macrophages

2021· preprint· en· W4249221068 on OpenAlexaffabout
David T. Vance

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternalizationPhagocytosisChemistryAntibodyReceptorCell biologyImmunoglobulin GMolecular biologyEndocytosisCytochalasin DBiochemistryBiologyImmunologyCellCytoskeleton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phagocytic macrophages bind to solid oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) deposited on the arterial intima, differentiate into foam cells and cause atherosclerosis - the largest cause of mortality in Canada. The mechanism of oxLDL internalization was examined in vitro using differentiated U937 cells exposed to latex microbeads coated with oxLDL or Immunoglobulin G (IgG). Bead internalization was quantified using immunofluorescent staining and laser confocal assays. IgG-mediated engulfment was more rapid than oxLDL-mediated engulfment indicating a qualitatively different internalization pathway. The filamentous actin inhibitors Cytochalasin D (10uM) and Latrunculin B (5uM) completely inhibited phagocytosis of both oxLDL-coated and IgG-coated beads. The Src and Spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor 3,4-methylenedioxy-beta-nitrostyrene (20 uM), the phospholipase C inhibitor U73122 (5 uM), and the Janus kinase inhibitor AG 490 (25 uM) displayed significant inhibitory effects on the phagocytosis of both IgG and oxLDL microbeads. The specific isoforms of oxLDL and IgG receptor associated enzymes were determined by nano LC-ESI-MS/MS with an LTQ ion trap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207