MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249295112 · doi:10.4000/criminocorpus.2479

Justine Berlière, Policer Paris au siècle des Lumières : Les commissaires du quartier du Louvre dans la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle

2013· article· fr· W4249295112 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Abdela

Bibliographic record

VenueCriminocorpus revue hypermédia · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qui sont les commissaires de police et que font-ils ? Voilà les questions centrales auxquelles s’attaque Justine Berlière dans Policer Paris au siècle des Lumières. Pour y parvenir, elle a ciblé un quartier de Paris, le Louvre, une des plaques tournantes de la cité, à l’intérieur duquel se sont succédés quatre commissaires entre 1751 et 1791 : Pierre Chénon et son fils, Marie-Jospeh Chénon, Hubert Mutel et Louis Cadot. C’est à partir de ces quatre individus qu’elle tente de dresser un tablea...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCriminocorpus revue hypermédiaSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207