MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4249329810 · doi:10.7202/027705ar

Ententes sur le reclassement des travailleurs à l’occasion d’une fermeture d’usine

2005· article· fr· W4249329810 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Service de Reclassement de la main-d'oeuvre du ministère du Travail a annoncé la conclusion d'ententes qui permettent de reclasser 205 mineurs qui devront quitter leur emploi à la suite de la fermeture de la mine East Sullivan de Val d'Or. Une clause de la dernière convention collective entre la compagnie et les métallurgistes unis d'Amérique prévoyait la formation d'un comité de reclassement. Le Ministère du Travail du Québec dans le cadre de sa politique de main-d'oeuvre, a accepté de constituer un comité de reclassement. Ce comité a étudié la situation des employés et a soumis des recommandations qui ont été suivies de signatures d'ententes entre le Syndicat et la compagnie. Le comité comprenait des représentants des ministères du Travail et des Richesses Naturelles, ainsi que des représentants de la compagnie et de l'union. Quatre ententes ont été signées sur le sujet suivant: les indemnités de licenciement, la récupération scolaire, la formation professionnelle, les subventions et prestations pour les fins de déménagement des employés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industrielles→Same topicMining and Resource Management→French-language works237,207→