MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249424537 · doi:10.4324/9780203067819-16

Environmental Health Policies and Issues in Canada

2014· book-chapter· en· W4249424537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Dibie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental planningPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Of all the economic development that has taken place in Trinidad and Tobago, half has occurred over the past four decades with devastating effect on biodiversity in the nation’s ecosystem ( Kenny, 2008 ). The effects also include the rapid extinction of species, the loss of forest and wetland, and harm to human health. In an attempt to solve the environmental problems in the country, the government of Trinidad and Tobago established its National Environmental Policy in 1990 and revised the Act in 2005. The goal for the establishment of this crucial policy was the need to develop a framework to address the environmental problems facing the nation. Since 2005, the formulation of other environmental policies has not been transparent and has not involved local stakeholders. Political leaders tend to rely more on technology rather than involving the local community in decision making that relates to the environment (Dhillion et al., 2010; Gaskell et al., 2005 ; Johnson, 2007 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207