MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249439902 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(19)30075-2

DCC Lansco reveals high strength yellow bismuth vanadate pigment

2019· article· en· W4249439902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditives for Polymers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPigment Synthesis and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPigmentDominionBismuth vanadateBismuthMaterials scienceVanadateDurabilityComposite materialChemistryMetallurgyArchaeologyHistoryOrganic chemistryPhotocatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pigments entity DCC Lansco, formed last year by the merger between Canadian pigments producer Dominion Colour Corp (DCC) and US-based pigments supplier Lansco Colours [ADPO, November 2018], has launched DCC ® Yellow RMXS. This bright lemon shade yellow pigment (Pigment Yellow 184) was designed to have the highest colour strength of any bismuth vanadate pigment in the market, exhibiting ‘outstanding hiding power, exceptional durability and superior dispersibility’, the company claims. It is reported to be suitable for use in an array of coatings systems and plastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditives for PolymersSame topicPigment Synthesis and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207