LNG Imports Into North America and Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LNG Imports Into North America and Implications Mike Juden; Mike Juden McKinsey & Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Tommy Inglesby; Tommy Inglesby McKinsey & Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Stuart Bodden Stuart Bodden McKinsey & Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 2008. Paper Number: OTC-19510-MS https://doi.org/10.4043/19510-MS Published: May 05 2008 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Juden, Mike, Inglesby, Tommy, and Stuart Bodden. "LNG Imports Into North America and Implications." Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, May 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.4043/19510-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsOffshore Technology ConferenceOTC Offshore Technology Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractThe need for LNG to fill the natural gas supply gap in North America may increase dramatically to 2015 and beyond as natural gas demand increases at rates higher than most observers expect. Developing CO2 legislation, increasingly advantaged gas-fired generation, oil sands demand, and biofuels demand could drive a greater than expected demand for natural gas domestically, with LNG imports expected to fill the gap.However, LNG liquefaction is expected to continue to be short to 2015 and beyond. These shortages are driven by increasing liquefaction costs, contractor/crew shortages, reserve access issues, project delays, and the often overlooked increasing domestic demand in the LNG exporting counties. Increasingly, LNG contracts will include flexible diversion clauses allowing movement of LNG supplies to markets other than originally contracted markets. Although there is some baseloaded North American LNG, significant LNG is attracted to North American regas based on price/producer-net-backs when other regions have adequate supplies to meet needs. The trend toward greater LNG flexibility could strengthen the linkage in North American natural gas pricing to alternate fuels through competition with Europe for LNG volumes priced at residual fuel oil and eventually with Asian crude-linked LNG.North America will compete with Europe and Asia for marginal LNG supplies unless European end users have over-contracted for LNG, which may well be the case. European and Asian end users, with based-loaded LNG, will retain LNG supplies, when needed, to fill supply needs irrespective of price. Over-contracted European LNG, if it were to flow to North America, would represent approximately 10 percent or more of U.S. and Canadian demand in 2010 and would go a long way in meeting a potential supply short-fall. With LNG at the margin, mechanisms impacting the level of North American LNG imports influence natural gas pricing, which in turn impacts gas producer and power generator profitability and company valuations.IntroductionNorth American natural gas demand, domestic supply, natural gas price setting mechanisms, Atlantic Basin pricing dynamics, and contracting regulations and practices for electric and natural gas utilities all impact the level of LNG imported into North America. The resulting flows of LNG, especially into the U.S., have very significant implications for the global LNG trade, as well as substantial and far-reaching implications for producers, LNG developers, end users, and policy-makers. Keywords: implication, end user, lng supply, canada, offshore technology conference, europe, supply and demand pricing, supply gap, north america, power demand Subjects: Natural Gas Conversion and Storage, Energy Economics, Liquified natural gas (LNG), Market analysis /supply and demand forecasting/pricing This content is only available via PDF. 2008. Offshore Technology Conference You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Industry conference paper on LNG imports and gas markets; an energy-economics question.
The work analyzes LNG markets, supply, demand, and pricing rather than research practice.
Industry energy paper on LNG imports into North America; commercial energy supply, not research.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".