EVALUASI PROGRAM NASIONAL PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT PENGEMBANGAN INFRASTRUKTUR EKONOMI WILAYAH (PNPM-PISEW)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Program Pengembangan Infrastruktur Sosial Ekonomi Wilayah (Regional Infrastructure for Socialand Economic Development – RISE), yang kemudian disingkat dengan PISEW diharapkan dapat menjawabkebutuhan dalam melakukan upaya pengentasan kemiskinan, dan pengurangan tingkat pengangguran terbukadengan juga meningkatkan kemampuan pemerintah daerah dalam melaksanakan desentralisasi dan otonomidaerah. Program PISEW dengan intervensi berupa bantuan teknis dan investasi infrastruktur dasar pedesaan,dibangun dengan berorientasi pada konsep “Community Driven Development (CDD)” dan “Labor IntensiveActivities (LIA)”, sehingga kemudian dikategorikan sebagai salah satu program PNPM-Mandiri. Dengandemikian kemudian program PISEW dikenal dengan nama PNPM-PISEW. Indikator-indikator penelitianmeliputi , evaluasi perencanaan, evaluasi pelaksanaan, evaluasipelaporan, evaluasi pemanfaatan berkelanjutandan evaluasi penguatan kelembagaan serta dampak dari pelaksanaan kegaitan PNPM-PISEW di KecamatanSintang tahun 2014 baik dampak yang diharapkan maupun dampak yang tidak diharapkan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".