MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249508990 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1276402

Hydroxyl radical: A possible mediator of nitroglycerin-induced vascular relaxation

2003· article· en· W4249508990 on OpenAlexaff
Lalita Bharadwaj, Kailash Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Angiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperoxide dismutaseAcetylcholineVasodilationSuperoxideNitric oxideMannitolChemistryRadicalPharmacologyVascular smooth muscleAnesthesiaMedicineBiophysicsBiochemistryInternal medicineOxidative stressEnzymeBiologySmooth muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The endothelium-derived relaxing factor, nitric oxide (NO·), is involved in acetylcholine (Ach) and nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. It is known that NO· interacts with the superoxide anion (O2·−) at physiological pH and this interaction leads to the generation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH). Hydroxyl radicals are known to induce dilation and act as mediators in acetylcholine (Ach)-induced relaxation of rabbit aortic smooth muscle. Thus, it was hypothesized that ·OH may be involved in NTG-induced relaxation. To test this hypothesis we investigated the effect of NTG on norepinephrine (NE)-precontracted isolated rabbit aortic rings in the absence and/or presence of O2·− [superoxide dismutase (SOD)] and ·OH scavengers [dimethylthiourea (DMTU) or mannitol]. Superoxide dismutase, DMTU, and mannitol markedly reduced NTG-induced relaxation of isolated rabbit aortic rings. Superoxide dismutase produced a 32% reduction in NTG-induced vasodilation. Pretreatment with DMTU and/or mannitol reduced NTG-induced relaxation by 56% and 49%, respectively. These results suggest that ·OH may be a mediator involved in NTG-induced vascular relaxation of rabbit aorta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AngiologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207