<i> <scp>T</scp> hermotogaceae </i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ther.mo.to.ga.ce'ae. N.L. fem. n. Thermotoga , type genus of the family; L. suff. ‐ aceae , ending to denote a family; N.L. fem. pl. n. Thermotogaceae , the family of Thermotoga . The family Thermotogaceae comprises sheathed thermophilic and hyperthermophilic, anaerobic, fermentative, and hydrogen‐producing bacteria. Cells are rod shaped, occurring singly, in pairs, or in chains. Cells are surrounded with sheaths, the so‐called togas. In stationary phase, they might look like “balloons.” Gram‐negative. Colonies are circular, convex, and vary in color from white to cream. The members of the family grow well on complex organic media and utilize a broad spectrum of carbon sources. Optimal growth at 60–80°C. Reduce thiosulfate and, in some cases, elemental sulfur, to sulfide. The family currently accommodates two genera, Thermotoga and Pseudothermotoga . The members of the family were isolated from geothermal heated marine sediments, shallow submarine thermal vents, hot springs, solfataric springs, oil reservoirs, and thermophilic bioreactors. DNA G + C content (mol%) : 38.7–51.3%. Type genus : Thermotoga Stetter and Huber 1986, 575 VP (Effective publication: Stetter and Huber in Huber, Langworthy, Konig, Thomm, Woese, Sleytr et al., 1986, 332) emend. Bhandari and Gupta 2014, 163. Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the family Thermotogaceae is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Thermotogati / Thermotogota / Thermotogae / Thermotogales / Thermotogaceae The family Thermotogaceae can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as f__Thermotogaceae (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Thermotogota / c__Thermotogae / o__Thermotogales / f__Thermotogaceae * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D785 – D794 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab776
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".