Abstract OT2-04-04: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy +/- immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An open label randomized phase 2 trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is synergistic with HER2-directed therapy in pre-clinical models. Clinically, pembrolizumab (K)-mediated ICI plus HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab (H) was safe and demonstrated modest activity in H-resistant HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Because ICI may confer more robust activity when administered earlier in the course of disease, HER2-directed therapy with ICI administered in the curative-intent, treatment-naive setting may allow for de-escalation of cytotoxic backbones; confer life-long, tumor-specific immunity; and ultimately, improve cure rates. Moreover, the synergy of H and K with paclitaxel (T) may overcome the need for dual HER2-blockade with H plus pertuzumab (P). In this randomized, multicenter, phase II, open-label trial, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant THP vs THP-K vs TH-K are being explored (NCT03747120). Methods: 174 patients (pts) ≥18years with previously untreated, clinical stage II-III, HER2+ breast cancer will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of 3 study arms, stratified by clinical nodal status (positive vs. negative) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). In arm A, pts receive THP: T at 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, H day 1 at 8 mg/Kg (loading dose) and then 6 mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses, P day 1 at 840 mg (loading dose) and then 420 mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP). In arm B, pts receive THP plus K day 1 at 200mg (flat dose) and then every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP-K). In arm C, pts receive TH-K. Definitive surgery is 3-6 weeks after the last dose of T. After surgery, pts are treated per the treating physician’s discretion including HER2-directed therapy, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy per local clinical standards. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and axilla (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Secondary end points include pCR rate by ypT0ypN0 and ypT0/Tis, residual cancer burden index, event free survival, breast conserving surgery rate, safety and overall survival. Exploratory correlative studies will characterize potential immune biomarkers predictive of efficacy and/or toxicity. Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Jorge Leal, David Page, Christina DiLauro Abaya, Reva Basho, Lindsey Ristow, Hannah Coleman, Stephen Shiao, Simon Knott, Monica Mita, Mourad Tighiouart, Alice Chung, Farnaz Dadmanesh, Philomena McAndrew, Scott Karlan, Sunil Verma, Armando Giuliano. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy +/- immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An open label randomized phase 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-04.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".