Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud, Code civil du Québec et Code de procédure civile, 2000-2001, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, 2000, pagination multiple, ISBN 2-89127-509-8 Henri Brun, Pierre Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, jurisprudence et doctrine, 13 édition, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 1187 pages, ISBN 2-89127-502-0 Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international, Annuaire, Volume XXIX : 1998, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 469 pages, ISBN 92-1-133620-1 et Rapport de la Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international sur les travaux de sa trente-deuxième session, 17 mai-4 juin 1999, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 62 pages, ISSN 0251-9151 Nicole Duplé, Droit constitutionnel : principes fondamentaux, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, 1 édition 2000, 545 pages, ISBN 2-89127-505-5 André Gouron, Juriste et droits savants : Bologne et la France médiévale, Aldershot, Ashgate-Variorum, Collected Studies Series, 2000, x + 304 pages, ISBN 0-86078-816-4 Luc Huppé, Le régime juridique du pouvoir judiciaire, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 246 pages, ISBN 2-89127-520-9 Dominique Loslier, Marie-Andrée Miquelon et Sylvie Théoret, Mesure disciplinaire et non disciplinaire 1982-1998, 4 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 793 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0118-4 Ejan Mackaay (dir.), Les certitudes du droit, Montréal, Thémis, 2000, 278 pages, ISBN 2-89400-126-6 Mary Jane Mossman (dir.), La montée en puissance des juges : ses manifestations, sa contestation / The Judiciary as Third Branch of Government: Manifestations and Challenges to Legitimacy, Montréal, Thémis, 1999, 468 pages, ISBN 2-89400-135-5 Ouvrage collectif, Théories et émergence du droit : pluralisme, surdétermination et effectivité, Montréal, Thémis, 1998, 266 pages, ISBN 2-8027-1140-7 Solange Pelletier, Injonction 1987-1998, 3 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 455 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0113-3 Service de la formation permanente, Barreau du Québec, Développements récents en droit familial 126, Montréal, Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1999, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-368-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un article de la revue Revue générale de droit, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.076 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".