Atomic‐Scale Compositional Fluctuations in Ternary III‐Nitride Nanowires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ternary InGaN and AlGaN alloys have been sought after for the application of various optoelectronic devices spanning a large spectral range between the deep ultraviolet (DUV) and infrared (IR), including light‐emitting diodes, and laser diodes. Conventional planar devices suffer from a high density of dislocations due to the large lattice mismatch, which together with the non‐ideal alloy mixing, are established as the cause for various phase separation, surface segregation, and chemical ordering processes commonly observed in nitride alloys. Growth in a nanowire (NW) geometry can overcome these processes by providing enhanced strain relaxation at the free surfaces. In both InGaN and AlGaN, their superior operational characteristics can be attributed to enhanced charge carrier localization at alloy inhomogeneities down to the atomic‐scale. Atomic‐level chemical ordering in wurtzite InGaN and AlGaN epilayers, describing preferential site occupancy of the cation sublattice by the group III atoms, has been reported mostly with a 1:1 periodicity along the [0001] growth direction [1]. Reports of atomic ordering in cubic ternary III‐V alloys (including III‐As and III‐P) have remained limited to planar thin films; its prevalence within NWs had not been explored. InGaN/GaN dot‐in‐a‐wire nanostructures grown on Si(111) by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) were recently developed to achieve more controlled light emission across the entire visible spectrum [2], and characterized using aberration‐corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) [3]. High‐angle annular dark‐field (HAADF) Z‐contrast imaging shows the InGaN quantum dots (QDs) with atypical oscillating HAADF image intensity at the atomic‐level along the c ‐axis growth direction, exhibiting alternating bright/dark atomic‐planes within the QDs [3]. Electron diffraction patterns obtained from the QDs show the presence of otherwise forbidden superlattice reflections, unambiguously confirming the presence of 1:1 bilayer atomic ordering [1]. In addition, atomic‐resolution elemental mapping using electron energy‐loss spectroscopy (EELS) shows significant In‐enrichment in alternating c ‐planes matching the maxima in the ADF signal collected concurrently, with a deviation from the local mean composition by >25%. Corresponding annular bright field imaging (ABF) enables the visualization of light elements like N, and was used to directly deduce the NWs as N‐face polarity. It also indicates that the In‐atoms have a preferential occupation at the lower‐coordination site along a pyramidal surface facet, which is the first experimental evidence [3] validating the existing theoretical structure model for ordered InGaN layers [4]. Compositional inhomogeneities were also investigated in MBE‐grown self‐catalyzed AlGaN NWs, which exhibit high luminescence efficiency in the DUV range [5]. With increasing Al concentration, atomic‐scale compositional modulations can be induced due to differences in Ga‐ and Al‐adatom migration and incorporation at the growth front. The modulating HAADF intensities were confirmed as Ga‐rich/Al‐rich regions using EELS elemental mapping at atomic‐resolution. Furthermore, their QD/quantum dash‐like nature was determined based on multi‐orientation views of the same atomic‐scale Ga‐rich regions. Such atomic‐scale compositional modulations in AlGaN can provide energy band fluctuations leading to strong three‐dimensional confinement of charge carriers [6].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".