MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249615009 · doi:10.2167/jmmd574.0

Representations of Linguistic and Ethnocultural Diversity in Poland's Education Policy, National School Curricula and Textbooks

2008· article· en· W4249615009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInro Consultants (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage policyMulticulturalismCurriculumEuropean unionLegislationEthnic groupPolitical scienceNational curriculumNative-language instructionSociologyMulticultural educationDemocracyPedagogyLawTeaching methodPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With its recent entry into the European Union (EU) and the adoption of multiethnic democracy as a national policy, a key challenge for Poland is to transform its education policy and practice in ways that are consistent with multicultural and pluralist values. This paper examines Poland's efforts to address these issues by exploring changes in the national education policy, school curricula and history textbooks. The author argues that despite greater representation of minority languages and cultures in schools in Poland, a disjunction exists between the policy discourse of multicultural education and the reality of education practice that conforms to traditional Polish conceptions of interethnic relations. The study further shows that history textbooks sustain a discourse promoting the existence of Poland as an ethnically defined nation state, exclusive of minority identities and cultures. Ethnic minority integration continues to be associated primarily with a one-sided process of minority adaptation, rather than a process of interactivity and mutual recognition. Keywords: multicultural educationeducational policy studiescurriculum studiesinternational education Notes 1. According to the Central Statistical Office (2002), an estimated 2.3% of respondents refused to declare their ethnicity during Poland's last census in 2002, possibly for fear of discrimination. 2. The new Polish legislation includes: The Constitution of the Republic of Poland (2 April 1997), The Election Law (1990–2004), The Act on the Polish Language (7 October 1999), The Education Act (7 September 1991), Act on National and Ethnic Minorities and on the Regional Language (6 January 2005), the Regulation by the Minister of National Education on National and Ethnic Minorities (3 December 2002), Broadcasting Act (1992). Poland has also adopted a number of international laws: the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950; the International Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 7 March 1966; the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989; the Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on Protection of National Minorities (1 February 1995); the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (12 May 2003) (not binding). Poland has also signed bilateral treaties with the Federal Republic of Germany, the Czech Federal Republic, the Slovak Federal Republic, Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Republic of Lithuania, which further guarantee the protection of the rights of national minorities. 3. National minorities are those that are identified with an existing nation (e.g. Ukraine, Germany). Ethnic minorities are not identified with a nation. 4. The Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on Protection of National Minorities issued on 1 February 1995 (binding), and the European Charter for Minority Languages issued on 5 November 1992 (not binding).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it