Can the magmatic conditions of the Martian nakhlites be discerned via investigation of clinopyroxene and olivine crystallographic slip-systems?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deformation is a near ubiquitous process that is observed within nearly all naturally forming rocks, terrestrial and extra-terrestrial. Large area electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a technique that enables slip-systems (a form of plastic deformation) to be inferred at a comparable scale to representative texture analysis (≥100 crystals). Extensive laboratory and studies on naturally occurring samples have identified preferential extrinsic parameters for specific slip-system signatures within olivine and clinopyroxene for mantle conditions. Slip-systems in both olivine and augite (high Ca-clinopyroxene) for 21 large area EBSD datasets sourced from 16 different Martian nakhlite meteorites were analysed and assessed against these parameters. When investigating the high and low deformation regions within the samples 10 of the 21 sections exhibited a shift in the slip-system patterns between the low and high deformation regions. The secondary signatures identified within the low deformation regions are inferred to relate to emplacement deformation. Thus, these samples exhibit both shock and emplacement signatures. The observed variations in deformation patterns for the two main regimes of deformation indicate heterogeneous sampling of the nakhlite ejecta crater. Our findings indicate that shock deformation is prevalent throughout the nakhlites, and that great care needs to be taken when interpreting slip-deformation of crystals within apparent lower deformation regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".