The process of cardiorespiratory autoresuscitation in intact newborn rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To examine the process of spontaneous autoresuscitation and the recovery of the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) after prolonged anoxia, we monitored respiratory frequency (f, by body plethysmography) and heart rate (HR, by ECG) in intact newborn rats (n = 12, day 24) before, during, and after 100% N2 exposure. The rat before anoxia showed signs of HVR: f changes at acute hypoxia (10% O2) and hyperoxia (100% O2). During anoxia, the spontaneous respiratory movement "gasping" appeared for 21 min (mean). At O2 restoration (with 100% O2), gasping stopped and no respiratory flow was detected for 1 min. One rat failed to autoresuscitate and had heart arrhythmia during the transient apnea, but 11 rats recovered respiration after the HR acceleration. Despite the successful autoresuscitation, the rats did not show HVR at 10 min into the recovery period and the recovery of HVR required more than 30 min. The results indicate that O2 inhalation is useful to trigger autoresuscitation even when the rat has already been in a state of profound hypoxic depression, but the rat becomes transiently insensitive to HVR after autoresuscitation. We estimate that reform of the respiratory control system in newborn rats is not yet firmly established to track HVR early in the recovery phase after prolonged anoxia.Key words: anoxia, hypoxic ventilatory response, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), sudden infant death (SID).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".