The Influence of a Virtual Reality Leisure Intervention Program on the Motivation of Older Adult Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This pilot study explores a novel virtual reality (VR) leisure intervention program's influence on the motivation of older adult stroke survivors. Sixteen older adult stroke survivors participated in a one time only VR session. These individuals were observed interacting with a variety of objects within a variety of VR environments that were video recorded. The Volitional Questionnaire was used to measure the degree of volition exhibited by the stroke survivors during their participation in VR activities. Descriptive statistics were calculated to derive means and standard deviations of total volitional, depression, life satisfaction, and cognitive status scores for each participant. The total volitional mean score was 3.03 with a standard deviation of 0.51. This score indicates that individuals engaged in activities volitionally. Volitional scores were also correlated with scores of depression and life satisfaction. No significant correlations were found. The results of the current study indicate that VR provides a motivating experience for stroke survivors and thus has the potential to serve as a successful leisure intervention tool for this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it