Bibliographic record
Abstract
4. The African TransposedJean Devisse and Michel Mollat and William Granger Ryan (Translator)The Image of the Black in Western Art, Volume II: From the Early Christian Era to the "Age of Discovery," Part 2: Africans in the Christian Ordinance of the WorldThe last quarter of the fifteenth century witnessed a fresh outbreak of representations of Africans. From then on the black is really "seen" and "translated" in various ways. This variety reflects the contradictions in which Europe was living. Except for the highly localized example of St. Maurice, the most traditional theme and the one most closely connected with the...AuthorJean Devisse and Michel Mollat and William Granger Ryan (Translator)PublisherHarvard University PressCopyright© 1979 by Menil Foundation, Inc.Related print edition pages: pp.185-279 https://doi.org/10.37862/aaeportal.00138.008 Stable URL: https://aaeportal.com/?id=-16974Copy Chapter subject tags:Africa--Discovery and explorationAfricans in artArt and historyChristian art and symbolism--Medieval, 500-1500Magi--Art
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".