Software energy consumption prediction using software code metrics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, a significant amount of energy consumption of ICT products has resulted in environmental concerns. Growing demand for mobile devices, personal computers, and the widespread adaptation of cloud computing and data centers are the main drivers for the energy consumption of the ICT systems. Finding solutions for improving the energy efficiency of the systems has become an important objective for both industry and academia. In order to address the increase in ICT energy consumption, hardware technology, such as production of energy efficient processors, has been substantially improved. However, demand for energy is growing faster than improvements are being made on these energy-aware technologies. Therefore, in addition to hardware, software technologies must also be a focus of research attention. Although software does not consume energy by itself, its characteristics determine which hardware resources are made available and how much electrical energy is used. Current literature on the energy efficiency of software, highlights, in particular, a lack of measurements and models. In this dissertation, first, the relationship between software code properties and energy consumption is explored. Second, using static code metrics regression based energy consumption prediction models are investigated. Finally, the models performance are assessed using within product and cross-product energy consumption prediction approaches. For this purpose, a quantitative based retrospective cohort study was employed. As research methods, observational data collection, mining software repositories, and regression analysis were utilized. This research results show inconsistent relationships between energy consumption and code size and complexity attributes considering different types of software products. Such results provide a foundation of knowledge that static code attributes may give some insights but would not be the sole predictors of energy consumption of software products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".