MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Characteristics Associated With Unsuccessful Pessary Fitting Outcomes

2014· article· en· W4249683349 on OpenAlexaff
Roxana Geoffrion, Tina Zhang, Terry Lee, Geoffrey W. Cundiff

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPessaryMedicineLogistic regressionUrogynecologyOddsMultivariate analysisQuality of life (healthcare)Odds ratioSurgeryUrinary incontinenceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Options for patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) include surgery and conservative management using a pessary. Two thirds of patients with POP offered a choice between surgery and pessary initially opt for the pessary. Success rates for pessary fittings vary widely. Previous studies have investigated possible clinical predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting. However, lack of clear definitions for an unsuccessful fitting hinders research, and studies attempting to identify clinical predictors for unsuccessful fitting are inconsistent. It has been hypothesized that certain individual patient characteristics may predict unsuccessful fitting. When identified, the presence of these factors could be used to counsel patients faced with the treatment choice between pessary and surgery for POP. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify clinical characteristics and quality-of-life/symptom scores associated with an unsuccessful trial of pessary (TOP) in women with POP. Data were collected for 101 women with POP who underwent pessary fittings between 2006 and 2012 at a tertiary urogynecology unit. Treatment options were explained to all participants. Baseline standard POP quantification staging was performed. At baseline, patients completed detailed history and validated pelvic floor quality-of-life and symptom questionnaires. An unsuccessful TOP was defined as an inability to continue use of the pessary beyond 4 weeks from initial fitting. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to build a prediction model for odds of unsuccessful TOP. Patient discomfort was the primary reason for unsuccessful TOP. Multivariate analysis showed that the following clinical characteristics were significantly associated with the likelihood of unsuccessful TOP: age 65 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 3.13; P = 0.042), smoking history (OR, 3.42; P = 0.049), genital hiatus/total vaginal length ratio greater than 0.8 (OR, 6.70; P = 0.042), and lower POP quantification overall stage (OR, 2.84; P = 0.017). Variables not associated with the likelihood of unsuccessful TOP included sexual activity and concurrent urinary or POP symptoms. These findings show that pessaries remain a good treatment option for women with POP. The data show a number of clinical characteristics that influence the likelihood of unsuccessful TOP. Clinicians can use these results to counsel women with POP faced with a choice between conservative and surgical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207