The Nurse’s Role in Addressing Barriers to Cancer Screening of African Americans: An Integrative Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In January 2018, the Philippine Nurses Association of America (PNAA) held its 11th International Conference & 2nd Global Summit in Manila, Philippines.The first PNAA International Conference was in 1996 and it has been held every two years since that time.Through the years, PNAA has collaborated with the Philippine Nurses Association (PNA); the Association of Deans of Philippine Colleges of Nursing (ADPCN); and once with the University of the Philippines and at another time, with St. Paul University system.During these conferences, PNAA showcased expert speakers in nursing practice, education, administration, regulation and research from different countries but mostly were members of PNAA.Attendees came from many countries where Filipino nurses migrate and practice such as the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, the Middle East (Kuwait, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates), Australia, Canada, and Asian countries (Singapore, Japan) but the majority of attendees were from the Philippines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".