Bibliographic record
Abstract
Next article FreeEditors’ NoteEditors’ NoteStephen Brain, Mark D. Hersey, and Finis DunawayStephen Brain Search for more articles by this author , Mark D. Hersey Search for more articles by this author , and Finis Dunaway Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe first issue of 2020 explores the relationship between humans and the natural world in five intriguing and geographically diverse instances. The outgoing president of the American Society for Environmental History, Graeme Wynn, edited his presidential address (“Framing an Ecology of Hope”) for publication in the journal and, in it, provides a comparison of two late twentieth-century Canadian intellectuals who charted paths toward ecological sustainability. The articles that follow take the reader on a whirlwind tour of fin-de-siècle Egypt, prewar Britain, stagflation-era United States, Maoist China, and an imaginary Hawaii (by way of Japan and Boston) in a future that never came to pass. In the Gallery essay, Claire Campbell takes us to the urban shoreline of Halifax, Nova Scotia, to consider how industrial modernity transformed the relationship between city and sea, raising questions about urban shorelines in an age of rising sea levels. Despite their diversity, the articles intersect in intriguing ways: for instance, Caleb Wellum’s energy independence movement helped to undermine the Hawaiian ecomodernist vision described by Stefan Huebner, and English efforts to impose their will on the landscape detailed by Samuel Grinsell reappear, albeit in altered form, in Peter Coates’s article about muskrats invading the English homeland. Whether looking at Egypt, China, or North America, these articles offer a reminder of the ways in which environmental history can illuminate familiar topics and, in so doing, add the context and nuance necessary to address the environmental challenges facing the world today. Next article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 25, Number 1January 2020 Published for the American Society for Environmental History and the Forest History Society Views: 80Total views on this site Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emz083HistoryPublished online December 20, 2019 © 2019 The Authors. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.515 | 0.485 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".