MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4249720263 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100050083

CJN volume 27 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

2000· paratext· en· W4249720263 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2000
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Environmental scienceComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

y ^w ro p i n i ro I e REQUJP ropinirole (as ropitiirole hydrochloride) Tablets: 0.25 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, 5.0 mg THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION Antiparkinsonian Agent / Dopamine Agonist INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE REQUIP (ropinirole hydrochloride) is indicated in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.REQUIP can be used both as early therapy, without concomitant levodopa and as an adjunct to levodopa.CONTRAINDICATIONS REQUIP (ropinirole hydrochloride) is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to ropinirole hydrochloride or the excipients of the drug product.WARNINGS Orthostatic Symptoms -Dopamine agonists appear to impair the systemic regulation of blood pressure with resulting orthostatic symptoms of dizziness or lightheadedness, with or without documented hypotension.These symptoms appear to occur especially during dose escalation.Therefore, patients treated with dopamine agonists should be carefully monitored for signs and symptoms of orthostatic hypotension, especially during dose escalation and should be informed of this risk.Hallucinations -In controlled trials, REQUIP (ropinirole hydrochloride) caused hallucination in 5.1% of patients during early therapy (1.4% in the placebo group) and in 10.1% of patients receiving REQUIP and levodopa (4.2% receiving placebo and levodopa).Hallucination was of sufficient severity that it led to discontinuation in 1.3% and 1.9% of patients during early and adjunct therapy, respectively.The incidence of hallucination was dose-dependent both in early and adjunct therapy studies.PRECAUTIONS Cardiovascular -Since REQUIP (ropinirole hydrochloride) has not been studied in patients with a history or evidence of significant cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac decompensation, cardiac arrhythmias, vaso-occlusive disease (including cerebral) or cardiomyopathy, it should be used with caution in such patients.There is limited experience with REQUIP in patients treated with antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic agents.Consequently, in such patients, the dose of REQUIP should be titrated with caution.Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome -A symptom complex resembling the neuroleptic malignant syndrome (characterized by elevated temperature, muscular rigidity, altered consciousness, and autonomic instability), with no other obvious etiology, has been reported in association with rapid dose reduction, withdrawal of, or changes in anti-Parkinsonian therapy.A single spontaneous report of a symptom complex resembling the neuroleptic malignant syndrome has been observed in a 66 year old diabetic male patient with Parkinson's disease, who developed fever, muscle stiffness, and drowsiness 8 days after beginning REQUIP treatment.The patient also experienced acute bronchitis, which did not respond to antibiotic treatment.REQUIP was discontinued three days before the patient died.The reporting physician considered these events to be possibly related to REQUIP treatment.A single spontaneous report of severe muscle pain has been reported in a 66 year old male patient around his thigh.The reporting physician considered the event to be probably related to REQUIP treatment.Retinal Pathology in Rats -In a two year carcinogenicity study in albino Sprague-Dawley rats, retinal atrophy was observed at incidences of 0%, 1.4%, 1.4% and 10% of male rats and 0%, 4.4%, 2.9% and 12.9% of female rats dosed at 0,1.5,15 and 50 mg/kg/day respectively.The incidence was significantly higher in both male and female animals dosed at 50 mg/kg/day.The 50 mg/kg/day dose represents a 2.8 fold greater exposure (AUC) and a 13.1 fold greater exposure (Cmax) to ropinirole in rats than the exposure would be in humans at the maximum recommended dose of 24 mg/day.The relevance of this finding to humans is not known.Pregnancy -The use of REQUIP during pregnancy is not recommended.REQUIP given to pregnant rats during organogenesis (gestation days 8 through 15) resulted in decreased fetal body weight at 60 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 -4 times the AUC at the maximal human dose of 8 mg t.i.d), increased fetal death at 90 mg/kg/day (approximately 5 times the AUC at the maximal human dose of 8 mg t.i.d ) and digital malformations at 150 mg/kg/day (approximately 8-9 times the AUC at the maximal human dose of 8 mg t.i.d).These effects occurred at maternally toxic doses.There was no indication of an effect on development of the conceptus at a maternally toxic dose of 20 mg/kg/day in the rabbit.In a perinatalpostnatal study in rats, 10 mg/kg/day of REQUIP (approximately 0.5 -0.6 times the AUC at the maximal human dose of 8 mg t.i.d) impaired growth and development of nursing offspring and altered neurological development of female offspring.Nursing Mothers -Since REQUIP suppresses lactation, it should not be administered to mothers who wish to breast-feed infants.Studies in rats have shown that REQUIP and/or its metabolites cross the placenta and are excreted in breast milk.Consequently, the human fetus and/or neonate may be exposed to dopamine agonist activity.Use in Women receiving Estrogen Replacement Therapy -In female patients on long-term treatment with conjugated estrogens, oral clearance was reduced and elimination halflife prolonged compared to patients not receiving estrogens (see Pharmacokinetics).In patients, already receiving estrogen replacement therapy, REQUIP may be titrated in the recommended manner according to clinical response.However, if estrogen replacement therapy is stopped or introduced during treatment with REQUIP, adjustment of the REQUIP dosage may be required.Pediatric Use -Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population have not been established.Renal and Hepatic Impairment -No dosage adjustment is needed in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 mL/min).Because the use of REQUIP in patients with severe renal impairment or hepatic impairment has not been studied, administration of REQUIP to such patients is not recommended.Drug Interactions -Psychotropic Drugs: Neuroleptics and other centrally active dopamine antagonists may diminish the effectiveness of REQUIP.Therefore, concomitant use of these products is not recommended.Based on population pharmacokinetic assessment, no interaction was seen between REQUIP and tricyclic antidepressants or benzodiazepines.Anti-Parkinson Drugs: AVAILABILITY OF DOSAGE FORM REQUIP is supplied as a pentagonal film-coated Tiltab" tablet with beveled edges containing ropinirole (as ropinirole hydrochloride) as follows: 0.25 mg -white imprinted with SB and 4890; 1.0 mg -green imprinted with SB and 4892; 2.0 mg -pale pink imprinted with SB and 4893; 5.0 mg -blue tablets imprinted with SB and 4894.REQUIP is available in bottles in the pack size of 100 tablets.It is also available in 0.25 mg as a single unit blister pack of 21 tablets.Full Product Monograph available to practitioners upon request.REFERENCES: 1. Rascol O, et al.Ropinirole in the Treatment of Early Parkinson's Disease: A 6-Month Interim Report of a 5-Year Levodopa-controlled Study.Moi7 Dfeorrf 1998;13:39-45.4. Schrag AE, et at The Safety of Ropinirole, a selective non-ergoline dopamine agonist in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6690.531

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→