MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249734866 · doi:10.7227/cst.6.1.10

Reviews: Prime Time Soap Operas on indian Television, beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour, Reading Little Britain: Comedy Matters on Contemporary Television, Media Audiences: Television, Meaning and Emotion, Music, Sound, and Silence in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Seven Up!, Civilisation, Dexter: Investigating Cutting Edge Television, the Queer Politics of Television, Queer TV: Theories, Histories, Politics, Gender and Sexuality in Star Trek: Allegories of Desire in the Television Series and Films, Invasion of the Mind Snatchers: Television's Conquest of America in the Fifties, Dangerously Funny: The Uncensored Story of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour, the War for Late Night: When Leno Went Early and Television Went Crazy, Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, Small Screen, Big Picture: Television and Lived Religion, beyond Prime Time: Television Programming in the Post-Network Era

2011· article· en· W4249734866 on OpenAlexaff
Hugh O’Donnell, Phil Wickham, Rhiannon Bury, Beth Carroll, Paul F. Kerr, Stephanie Green, Lance Pettitt, Lorna Jowett, Janet McCabe, Mark Lawson, Rhonda V. Wilcox, Robert J. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComedyJokeReading (process)Prime timeTelevision studiesMeaning (existential)ArtLiteratureMedia studiesAdvertisingSociologyPsychologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCritical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television StudiesSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207