MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249749843 · doi:10.1057/9781137024763_4

Enter Ofelia playing on a Lute

2014· book-chapter· en· W4249749843 on OpenAlexaff
Deanne Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuteHAMLET (protein complex)FolioArtLiteratureComedy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let us consider the following stage direction, from the first quarto version of Hamlet , or Q1 (1603): 1 Enter Ofelia playing on a Lute, and her hair down, singing . This stage direction appears in the second quarto, or Q2 (1604), as the minimalist Enter Ophelia . The 1623 Folio text describes Ophelia as mad: Enter Ophelia distracted . 2 Henry Cockeram’s 1623 English Dictionarie defines “distracted” as “mad, out of his wits.” 3 What does Ofelia’s lute in Q1 communicate to her audience? The instrument of choice among well-brought-up girls in the Renaissance (another option was the aptly-named virginal), the lute symbolizes the different perspective on Ofelia’s character that is evident throughout Ql: she is more accomplished, more forthright and expressive, than the Ophelia that is familiar to us from the Q2 and F versions of the play. It allows her mad scene to be read more as playlist than a garbled collection of snippets, a clear and self-conscious response to her predicament, rather than an emotional whirlwind. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207