MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Errata: An epeiric ramp: low‐energy, cool‐water carbonate facies in a Tertiary inland sea, Murray Basin, South Australia

2000· article· en· W4249753512 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff J. Lukasik, Noël P. James, Brian McGowran, Yvonne Bone

Bibliographic record

VenueSedimentology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaciesGeologyGrainstonePaleontologyWackestoneBenthic zoneSection (typography)CarbonateStructural basinOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unfortunately, the quality of Figure 6 in this paper, which was published in volume 47, issue 4, on pp. 851–881, was affected during typesetting and printing. Please find the figure reproduced at a higher quality below. The publisher apologizes for this error. (a and b) Large foraminiferan–bryozoan facies. (a) Bioclastic grainstone. Fragmented bryozoans and clypeasterid echinoids with crab claws, coralline red algae and abundant large benthic foraminiferans (mostly Operculina and Amphistegina). Facies FB-1, Glenforslan Formation, Noll Road (section 14). Coin approximately 1 cm diameter. (b) Bryozoan rudstone pod, facies FB-2, Glenforslan Formation, Blanchetown (section 12). Coin is 1·5 cm in diameter. (c and d) Echinoid–bryozoan facies. (c) Echinoid–bryozoan floatstone facies (EB-4a) with abundant infaunal echinoids. Lower Mannum Formation, Devon Downs (section 5). Hammer head is approximately 15 cm in length. (d) Thalassinoides burrows (arrow) filled with echinoids (Lovenia, Monostychia, Eupatagus), pectinid bivalves and bryozoans. Facies EB-4b, upper Mannum Formation, Devon Downs (section 5). Coin is 1·5 cm in diameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSedimentologySame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207