Erratum: Cover Art in <i>Applied Biosafety</i> (Volume 14, Number 2, 2009)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An error in file reading has resulted in a misrepresentation of the geographical locations of biosafety organizations on the cover art published in Volume 14, Number 2, 2009. A corrected map is provided in this erratum. The information contained in the “About the Cover” description is accurate and serves to assist in locating the biosafety organizations on the map. The stars represent the locations of the following global biological safety associations and working groups: African Biosafety Association, American Biological Safety Association, ABSA-Canada, Asia-Pacific Biosafety Association, Biosafety Association of Central Asia and the Caucuses, Biosafety Association of Pakistan, European Biosafety Association, Israeli Biological Safety Association, Japanese Biosafety Association, National Biosafety Association of Brazil, Philippines Biosafety and Biosecurity Association, Taiwan Biological Safety Association, and the Thailand Biosafety Working Group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".