MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249771071 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-946520

Neonatal macrocephaly: cerebral PNET (Primitive Neuro Ectodermal Tumor) or neuroblastoma as an infrequent cause: a case report and a review of the literature

2006· review· en· W4249771071 on OpenAlexaff
G Kaczala, K Poskitt, Paul Steinbok, A Solimano, G Hendson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrocephalyMedicinePediatricsPresentation (obstetrics)Head circumferencePercentileNeuroblastomaPregnancySurgeryGestational age

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Case presentation: We report a male term newborn with a congenital macrocephaly, 3.5 standard deviation above median noted at birth. The antenatal history, including ultrasonography was reported to be normal. The head circumference was measured between 10th and 50th percentile at 21 weeks 3/ 7 and 30 weeks 5/ 7, respectively. Postnatal adaptation was complicated by poor respiratory effort and the baby had to be intubated at 8 minutes of age. On clinical examination at admission to our unit we noted: A wide and tense anterior fontanel, splayed sutures without external bruising or swelling, a normal inspection of the spine and a provocable gag reflex, bilaterally 3mm wide and isoreactive pupils and general hypotonia with all extremities spontaneously and symmetrically moved were described. Initial imaging investigation was performed with a head ultrasound. There was a large intra- parenchymal mass in the right cerebral hemisphere with a compressed right lateral ventricle and a massively dilated right lateral temporal horn, as well as an enlarged and laterally displaced right frontal horn. All ventricles showed signs of ventriculitis. These findings were investigated further with a CT scan and a MRI. The initial differential diagnosis included teratoma and neuroblastoma with a communicating hydrocephaly. A decompression had to be performed and the histology showed the findings of a Primitive Neuro Ectodermal Tumor (PNET) or neuroblastoma. The cytogenetic analysis showed a previously reported abnormal clone with structural rearrangement involving chromosomes 1 and 15 and tetraploidy with unstable number of chromosomes (ISCN Nomenclature: 92, XXYY,? t (1;15) (p36; q24)/ 46, XY/ 92, XXYY), a mutation previously described. Discussion and review of the literature: The reported incidence of neonatal brain tumors is between 1.4 and 3.6 per 100,000 live births. The most commonly reported findings in a review of 250 cases of previously published congenital brain tumors were macrocephaly (28.7%), hydrocephalus (17.3%), detection by imaging pre- or postnatally (12.2%) and stillbirth (10.4%). Classically reported signs of intracranial hypertension reported in older children are very rarely present. In a previous review of 230 cases, 23 patients had an associated dysmorphic feature of various and nonspecific type. Conclusion: Congenital macrocephaly should be investigated carefully. The most frequent pathologies found, include hydrocephaly and intra- or extracranial hemorrhage. An initial head ultrasound seems to be adequate as a screening method. Should there remain some uncertainty after a CT scan, better imaging results are obtained with a MRI and when a tumour is found, the definite diagnosis will be secured by histopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207