Bibliographic record
Abstract
Édouard Glissant, écrivain et philosophe, a renouvelé la pensée de l’identité, de la race et de la relation entre cultures. Les plus importants spécialistes débattent sur la politique, l’imaginaire, les arts et la vie de Glissant. La pensée d’Édouard Glissant est aujourd’hui d’une intense actualité. L’écrivain philosophe a en effet renouvelé radicalement les conceptions de l’identité et de la race, du métissage et de la créolisation, des continents et des archipels. Son œuvre est désormais étudiée dans le monde entier. Un colloque international a réuni une vingtaine des plus importants spécialistes et de grands témoins comme Eduardo Manet et René Depestre. Les perspectives se croisent entre ces écrivains et ces chercheurs venus de la Caraïbe, des États-Unis, de Tunisie, d’Irlande, du Japon, du Canada… Ce livre reproduit leurs débats sur la politique, l’imaginaire, les arts et la vie de Glissant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".