MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4249835422 · doi:10.3138/jrpc.6.1.006

Book Reviews

2004· article· en· W4249835422 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachel Wagner, Gordon H. Matties, Jennifer Rycenga, Kelly J. Baker, Fred Mason, Anita Helmbold

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religion and Popular Culture · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGospelArt historyRomanceArtPerformance artTheologyPhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coates, Paul. Cinema, Religion, and the Romantic Legacy, reviewed by Rachel Wagner Reinhartz, Adele. Scripture on the Silver Screen, reviewed by Gordon Matties Sylvan, Robin. Traces of the Spirit: Religious Dimensions of Popular Music, reviewed by Jennifer Rycenga Plate, S. Brent, ed. Religion, Art, and Visual Culture: A Cross Cultural Reader, reviewed by Kelly J. Baker Henderson, Robert W. Ball, Bat, and Bishop: The Origin of Ball Games, reviewed by Fred Mason Neal, Connie, and Samuel F. (Skip) Parvin. The Gospel According to Harry Potter: Leader’s Guide for Group Study, reviewed by Anita Helmbold

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2580.308

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Religion and Popular CultureSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207