MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4249935982 · doi:10.17918/00000563

Paleoenvironment of the Morrison Formation in the Bighorn Basin of Montana, USA

2021· dissertation· en· W4249935982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashley L. Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural basinArchaeologyEnvironmental ethicsGeologyGeographyPaleontologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Morrison Formation is one of the most prolific dinosaur-bearing formations in the world, ranging from the Kimmeridgian-Tithonian in age. Stretching from northern New Mexico throughout much of the western United States and into southern Canada, the units of this Formation have been explored, particularly for dinosaur fossils, since the 1800s (Foster, 2003). However, the majority of research has focused primarily on exposures in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, where many of the most famous Jurassic- aged dinosaurs were initially found (Foster et al., 2016). The northern areas of the Morrison, however, have not been thoroughly explored until more recently, and have revealed a mix of unique and relatively common dinosaur species of the Jurassic age (Maltese et al., 2018). An exposure of the Morrison Formation located in the Bighorn Basin of Montana, here referred to as the Suuwassea Morrison Formation Site (SMFS), provides an excellent location to explore and compare to other northern sites within the Morrison Formation, as well as the longer-studied southern areas. In addition to more typical Morrison specimens of apatosaur, stegosaur, and allosaur material, a relatively unique specimen of the sauropod Suuwassea emilieae was initially discovered at this site (Harris and Dodson, 2004). The geology of this site, however, has remained largely unstudied, and the question remains if Suuwassea emilieae is unique to the area due to rarity, temporal differences, or environmental differences restricting its range. The primary goal of this research was determine the local paleoenvironment of the SMFS, particularly in comparison to the rest of the Morrison Formation. In order to accomplish this, I first explored the sedimentology and stratigraphy of the area, describing the sedimentology in detail, with special focus on areas with fossils. In addition, I drafted a detailed stratigraphic column, and identified paleosols, fossils, and photographed localities. I then focused further on the paleosols of the area, with detailed field descriptions, x-ray diffraction analysis, and thin section analysis, to determine the types of soils these profiles originally represented. Based on these data, I conclude the Morrison exposure of the SMFS represents an overall wet, seasonal environment, with fluctuating water tables enhanced by a combination of low base level related to the proximity of this region to the Sundance Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→