MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250008807 · doi:10.21611/qirt.2010.126

Fast and accurate calibration-based thermal / colour sensors registration

2010· article· en· W4250008807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité LavalInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationComputer scienceRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionGeologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combination of thermal and electro-optical sensors is useful in numerous applications related to inspection and monitoring. A few manufacturers already offer hybrid thermal / colour cameras. However, those off-the-shelf products generally provide independent images from both sensors whereas an accurate pixel-by-pixel registration would be greatly beneficial for most applications. This paper presents a calibration-based approach allowing the acquisition of co-registered thermal / visible videos with a simple side-by-side camera configuration. The proposed method has the interesting capabilities of accurately registering both fields of view by a single image mapping More specifically, this mapping converts distorted image coordinates from thermal image to corresponding distorted image coordinates of colour image. Once computed, the projection matrix can be optimized for a specific object distance. An original calibration rig optimized for the thermal spectrum is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it