MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250014650 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v37i00a05

Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011–2012

2011· article· en· W4250014650 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Joanne M. Langley, Bryna Warshawsky, Curtis Cooper, Natasha S. Crowcroft, Bonnie Henry, Deepali Kumar, Shelly McNeil, Caroline Quach-Thanh, B. Seifert, Danuta M. Skowronski, Wendy Vaudry, Richard Warrington, Jason Brophy, Alison C. Mawle, M. Pelletier, Karen Pielak, Pierre Plourde, Shelley Rechner, Marina I. Salvadori, Vyta Senikas, J. Anderson, Ezzat Farzad, Allan L. Klein, Julie Laroche, Ms Poulin, Paul Van Buynder, Brenda Cholin, Gaston DeSerres, Ian Gemmill, Scott A. Halperin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCollege of Family Physicians of CanadaThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of CanadaCanadian Public Health AssociationAssociation of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaCanadian Paediatric Society
FundersAssociation of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsStatement (logic)Seasonal influenzaVirologyInfluenza vaccineMedicineVaccinationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceInternal medicineLawInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific and public health advice relating to immunization and certain prophylaxis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0160.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207