MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250052892 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1992.245061

Neural processing-type fiber-optic strain sensor

2003· article· en· W4250052892 on OpenAlexaff
W.J. Bock, E. Porada, M.B. Zaremba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFiber optic sensorWireless sensor networkOptical fiberGeneralizationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsTelecommunicationsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present a neural-processing-type strain sensor insensitive to thermal variation and describe calibration of the device through modulation of the internal parameters of the processing system. The sensor exploits the variation of the far-field polarization pattern in a single-mode birefringent fiber under the influence of longitudinal strain. A temperature-compensating fiber element is built in, making the sensor assembly immune to thermal variation. Sampling of the sensor output and parallel distributed processing of the samples are integrated with the sensor. The processor contains both a training function and a generalization function. The training function modulates a small linear network built into the system. In the working phase, the generalization function is used to recover the measurement information. Provided the sensor is thermally compensated, the network gives the reading of the measurand with an error not exceeding 0.1%.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207