MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250054493 · doi:10.1002/9781118957844.ch22

Principles of Nutrient Management for Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Production

2015· other· en· W4250054493 on OpenAlexaff
D. J. Mead, C. Tattersall Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in bioenergy · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityAgroforestryForest managementSustainable forest managementWood productionEnvironmental scienceEcoforestrySoil fertilitySustainable managementBioenergyForest restorationForest farmingBusinessEnvironmental resource managementForest ecologyEcologySoil waterBiofuelEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For increased forest bioenergy to gain wide-scale acceptance, it must be shown to be sustainable. Sustainable management of forests includes environmental, social, and economic dimensions, with the overall objective of ensuring that forests will be available to supply the various demands placed on them by future generations. This chapter focuses on the nutritional aspects of forest sustainability. The environmental components of forest sustainability include productive capacity (including aspects of the extent of the forest estate as well as site and stand-level factors affecting tree growth), soil and water, biodiversity, forest health, and carbon budgets. The chapter builds on the considerable knowledge about landscapes and soil-that is, soil types, inherent fertility, soil nutrient processes, and resilience to change-tree and forest nutrient demands, silvicultural, harvesting and other management impacts, and forest management, including adaptive forest management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in bioenergySame topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207