MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4250102434 · doi:10.1086/340988

Reply

2002· article· en· W4250102434 on OpenAlexaff
Judith Falloon, Keith Gallicano, Aaron H. Burstein, Stephen C. Piscitelli

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsSeagen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIR—We agree with Dr. Borek [1] that, despite having data only on the interaction between a single garlic preparation and saquinavir, we drew a generalized conclusion regarding the need for patients to use caution if they combine garlic supplements with saquinavir when using that drug as the sole protease inhibitor [2]. Because we have no information to suggest which constituent (or excipient) in the garlic formulation is responsible for the drug interaction, we cannot speculate about the effects of other commercial products or dietary garlic on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir or relate our findings to allicin concentrations. We provided data on the allicin (and allin) content of the supplement we studied solely because we considered the verification of product content to be important. Since publication of our article, we have had a study brought to our attention in which garlic supplements were tested for drug release in simulated gastrointestinal conditions: most supplements released far less allicin in such conditions than they did when crushed and suspended in water [3]. Thus, the supplement we used may well release little allicin in vivo. Given the risks associated with reduced antiretroviral concentrations, we consider our conservative interpretation to be appropriate for use in advising patients [4, 5].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0200.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious Diseases→Same topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment→French-language works237,207→