Les formes de gestion de la vieillesse au Québec. Table ronde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte est organisé autour de cinq thèmes : évolution des formes de gestion de la vieillesse au Québec; prise en charge familiale; prise en charge institutionnelle et professionnelle; prise en charge par les pairs; scénarios d’avenir. Il reprend le compte rendu des interventions faites par quatre professeurs et un médecin lors d’une table ronde organisée par le comité de rédaction francophone de la Revue canadienne de service social ( RCSS , 6, 2,1989). De nombreuses interrogations se dégagent de la discussion, en relation notamment avec le désengagement de l’État, qui remet entre les mains de familles dont les structures et les configurations évoluent rapidement des personnes âgées que, souvent, une longévité accrue rend de moins en moins autonomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".