Bibliographic record
Abstract
In L.M. Cullen, “The Irish food crises of the 1740s” in Irish economic and social history, vol xxxvii (2010), p.23, data in the second and third columns of table 6 except for the last four lines were erroneously transposed. The table appears correctly in an earlier version of the paper in Au contact des lumières: Mèlanges offerts à Philippe Loupès, eds. Anne-Marie Cocula and Josette Pontet Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires, 2005, vol. 2, p 305. The correct version of the table appears below. [Table: see text] Note: A quarter equalled two barrels. The quarter and barrel are a measure, the weight varying according to the nature of the grain (A quarter of wheat weighed about 5 cwt.). Figures for flour are first recorded in the year ended 25 March 1744. The absence of comparable figures for preceding years (which, as flour was entering into cross-channel trade for the first time, are likely to have been small) may suggest that any quanties were included in the total for meal. Source: The figures are taken from data in the appendices to the Journals of the house of commons, principally vol. ix, app. ccxlvii; vol. xii, app. cccxlv-cccxlvi (some small discrepancies exist in different reports).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.179 | 0.133 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".