MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4250175750 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12662561

Predicting Chemical Reaction Equilibrium in Dilute Solutions by Atomistic Simulation: Application to CO2 Reactive Absorption in Aqueous Primary Alkanolamine Solutions

2020· preprint· en· W4250175750 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Noroozi, William L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkanolamineChemistrySolvationAqueous solutionThermodynamicsEquilibrium constantGibbs free energyChemical equilibriumSolventMolecular dynamicsComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryPartial chargeMoleculeOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a general atomistic simulation framework for efficient reactive equilibrium calculations in dilute solutions, and its application to CO2 reactive absorption in aqueous alkanolamine solutions. No experimental data of any kind for the solvents is required and no empirical adjustments are required for its implementation. This hybrid methodology involves calculating the required reaction equilibrium constants by combining high–level quantum chemical calculations of ideal–gas standard reaction Gibbs energies (∆G0 ) with conventional free energy calculations for transfer of the molecular species from the ideal gas to infinite dilution in the solvent (i.e, their solvation free energies). For the solvation free energy calculations, we use explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations with the General AMBER Force Field (GAFF). The resulting equilibrium constants are then coupled with a macroscopic Henry–Law–based ideal solution model to calculate the solution speciation and the CO2 partial pressure, PCO2 . We show results for seven primary amines: monoethanolamine (MEA), 2–amino–2–methylpropanol (AMP), 1–amino–2– propanol (1–AP), 2–amino–2–methyl–1,3–propanediol (AMPD), 2–aminopropane–1,3– diol (SAPD), 2–(2–aminoethoxy)ethanol (2–AEE) or diglycolamine (DGA), and 2– amino–1–propanol (2–AP). Experimental speciation and PCO2 data for some of these is available, with which we validate our methodology. We predict new results for others in cases when such data is unavailable, and provide explanations for the experimental inability to detect carbamate species in some cases. Our results for the pK value of the carbamate reversion reaction are within the chemical accuracy limit of 218.506/T in comparison with experiment when such data exist, which at 298.15 K corresponds to 0.73 pK units. We argue that the precision of our pK predictions in general is comparable to that which can be obtained from conventional experimental methodologies for these quantities. Our results suggest that the presented molecular simulation methodology may provide a robust and cost–efficient tool for solvent screening in the design of post–combustion CO2 capture processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207